REVISÃO DA LITERATURA E FORMAÇÃO DE UM MODELO HÍBRIDO DE ECOSSISTEMA DE INOVAÇÃO
Palavras-chave:
Inovação. Análise de Conteúdo. Bibliometria. Revisão Sistemática. Modelo Híbrido.
Resumo
O desenvolvimento econômico e social de uma nação, está atrelado a capacidade de inovar, ou seja, de criar produtos, processos, ideias e serviços com diferencial competitivo e com capacidade de enfrentar os principais players do mercado. Torna-se impossível na atual conjuntura econômica internacional fazer uma dissociação entre os conceitos de empreendedorismo, inovação e ecossistemas de inovação. Aprofundando o conceito de ecossistema de inovação e dos atores envolvidos nesses ambientes, realizou-se uma revisão sistemática de publicações na base de dados da Web of Science a partir da análise de conteúdo e da bibliometria para apresentar alguns dados importantes. O objetivo desta pesquisa foi criar um modelo híbrido de ecossistema de inovação, para tal intento, se adentrou na plataforma, depois de um protocolo de análise e chegou a 89 artigos analisados em profundidade. Em linhas gerais, pode-se constatar que a discussão dos ecossistemas de inovação perpassa pela aproximação entre a indústria, a sociedade, governo e diversos outros stakeholders, que o conceito assume diversas possibilidades de análise e que nos últimos cinco anos a quantidade de artigos científicos relacionados ao tema aumentou consideravelmente, justificando assim uma observação mais atenta da academia. Alcançou-se o objetivo da pesquisa, na configuração do modelo híbrido, a partir da observação que a estrutura da rede pode ser formada pela academia, governo, setor empresarial, investidores, instituições de suporte e a sociedade em geral. Observou-se também, que para a efetividade do ecossistema de inovação, é preciso que sejam gerados produtos e serviços inovadores a partir do fluxo de comunicação, conexão, conhecimento, produtos, finanças e pessoas.
Referências
ADNER, R. Match your innovation strategy to your innovation ecosystem. Harvard Business Review, v. 84, n.4, p.98-107, 2006.
ADNER, R, KAPOOR, R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, n. 3, p. 306–333, 2010.
ALLAHAR, H.; BRATHWAITE, C. Business incubation as an instrument of innovation: the experience of South America and the Caribbean. International Journal of Innovation, v. 4, n. 2, p. 71-85, Jul-Dec 2016.
APPIO, F.; LIMA, M.; PAROUTIS, S. Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 142, p. 1-14, 2019.
ARCHIBUGI, D.; CESARATTO, S; SIRILLI, G. Sources of innovative activities and industrial organization in Italy. Research Policy, v.20, p. 299-313, 1991.
AUDRETSCH, D. et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 2, p. 313-325, 2019.
AUDRETSCH, D., LEHMANN, E., MENTER, M. Public cluster policy and new venture creation. Economia e Politica Industriale, 43(4), p. 357–381, 2016.
AUDRETSCH, D. B., LINK, A. N. Embracing an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An analysis of the governance of research joint ventures. Small Business Economics. 52 (2), p. 429-436, 2017.
BACCARNE, B. et al. Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 22-30, 2016.
BENGTSSON, M. ; KOCK, S. Competition in Business Networks to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 14, 178-193. 2000.
BOSCH, J., BOSCH-SIJTSEMA, P. From Integration to Composition: On the Impact of Software Product Lines, Global Development and Ecosystems. The Journal of Systems and Software. p 67-76. 2010.
BOSCH, J. ; BOSCH-SIJTSEMA, P. ESAO: A holistic Ecosystem-Driven Analysis Model. C. Lassenius and K. Smolander (Eds.) Software Business. Towards Continuous Value Delivery. Anais 5th International Conference, ICSOB 2014, Paphos, Cyprus, June 16-18, vol. 182. p. 79 – 93. 2014.
BROWN, R. Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 189-205, 2016.
BROWN, R; MASON, C. Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, p. 11–30, 2017.
CARAYANNIS, E; CAMPBELL, D. ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management. v. 46, nº. 3-4, p. 201-234, 2009.
CARAYANNIS, E; CAMPBELL, D. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), v. 1, n. 1, p. 41-69, 2010.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D. Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of Knowledge Economic. v. 2, p. 327–372, 2011.
CARAYANNIS, E; BARTH, T; CAMPBELL, D. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation . Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. v. 1. 2, 2012.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; RAKHMATULLIN, R. The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economic. v. 5, p. 212–239, 2014.
CARAYANNIS, E; CAMPBELL, D; REHMAN, S. Mode 3 knowledge production: systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. p 5 -17, 2016
CHESBROUGH, H. Open innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. USA: HBS Press Book, 2003a. 272p.
CHESBROUGH, H. The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (Spring 2003), p. 35-41. 2003b.
CHESBROUGH, H.; APPLEYARD, M. Open innovation and strategy. California management review. v.50, Nº 1, p. 57-76, 2007.
CLAUDEL, M. From Organizations to Organizational Fields: The Evolution of Civic Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 8, n. 6, p. 34-47, 2018.
COHEN, W; FLORIDA, R; GOE, W. University-Industry Research Centers in the United States. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, p.111 – 133, 1994.
COLOMBO, M., DAGNINO, G., LEHMANN, E., SALMADOR, M. The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics. v.52, p. 419-428, 2017.
COLOMBELLI, A., PAOLUCCI, E., UGHETTO, E. Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Small Business Economics, v. 52, p.505-521 2017.
CUNNINGHAM, J., MENTER, M., WIRSCHING, K. Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: A principal investigator centered governance framework. Small Business Economics, v.52, p. 545- 562, 2017.
CUNNINGHAM, J., MENTER, M, O’KANE, C. Value creation in the quadruple helix: A micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators. R&D Management, p. 136–147. 2018.
DATTEE, B.; ALEXY, O.; AUTIO, E. Maneuvering in poor visibility: how firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, v. 61, n. 2, p. 466-498, 2018.
DEDEHAYIR, O; MÄKINEN, S. J; ORTT, J. R. Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v.136, p.18-29, 2018.
DE SILVA, Muthu; HOWELLS, Jeremy; MEYER, Martin. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, v. 47, n. 1, p. 70-87, 2018.
DI DIO, F.; CORREANI, L. Quality-improving and cost-reducing strategic alliances. Economia Política, v. 37, n. 2, p. 493-524, 2020.
DOSI, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy. v.
11, n. 3, p. 147-162, 1982.
DUBINI, P. The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public policies. Journal of business venturing, Elsevier, v. 4, n. 1, p. 11–26, 1989.
EDQUIST, C.; HOMMEN, L. Small country innovation systems: globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. 544 p.
ETZKOWITZ, H. The triple helix: Academic-industry-government relations - Implications for the New York regional innovation environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. v. 787, p. 67-86, 1996
ETZKOWITZ, H. Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of University- Industry- Government Relations. Social Science Information, Paris, v. 42, n. 3, p. 293- 337. 2003.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Silicon Valley at risk? Sustainability of a global innovation icon: An introduction to the Special Issue: Silicon Valley: Global model or unique anomaly/Numéro spécial: La Silicon Valley: Modèle global ou anomalie singulière, Social Science Information, 52 (4), p. 515-538. 2013
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix—University-Industry-Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, v. 14, p. 14–19. 1995.
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. (Conference Report), Science & Public Policy, Vol. 25(3), p. 195-203,1998.
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy v.29, p. 109-123, 2000.
FELD, B. Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City. Wiley, 2012. 212p.
FERDINAND, J. P.; MEYER, U. The social dynamics of heterogeneous innovation ecosystems: Effects of openness on community-firm relations. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, v. 9, p. 16, 2017.
GARELLI, S. Top class competitors: How nations, firms and individuals succeed in the new world of competitiveness. Chichester, Wiley, 2006. 272 p
GAWER, A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 7, p. 1239-1249, 2014.
GLÄNZEL, W., SCHOEPFLIN, U., A Bibliometric Study on Ageing and Reception Processes of Scientific Literature. Journal of Information Science, v. 21 (1), p. 37-53. 1995.
GUERRERO, M.; URBANO, D. Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1347-1366, 2019.
IANSISTI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2004.
LETEN, B. et al. IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, A PUBLIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN NANO-ELECTRONICS. California Management Review, v. 55, n. 4, p. 51-64. 2013.
HAKALA, H. et al. Re-storying the Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Concepts: The Model-Narrative Review Method. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 22, n. 1, p. 10-32. 2020.
HWANG, V. W.; HOROWITT, G. The Rainforest - the secret to building the next Silicon Valley. Los Altos Hills: Regenwald, 2012.
IANSITI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard business review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 68-81, 2004 a.
ISENBERG, D. The big idea: How to start and entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, p. 40–50. 2010.
ISENBERG, D. The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs, 2011a.
ISENBERG, D. Introducing the entrepreneurship ecosystem: Four defining characteristics. Forbes, May, v. 25, 2011b.
ISENBERG, D. What an Entrepreneurship Ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5, p. 1–7. 324, 2014.
ISENBERG, D. J. Applying the Ecosystem Metaphor to Entrepreneurship: Uses and abuses. The Antitrust Bulletin, v. 61(4), p. 564–573. 2016.
JACOBIDES, M.; CENNAMO, C.; GAWER, A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, v. 39, n. 8, p. 2255-2276. 2018.
JUCEVICIUS, G. et al. The Emerging Innovation Ecosystems and "Valley of Death": Towards the Combination of Entrepreneurial and Institutional Approaches. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, v. 27, n. 4, p. 430-438. 2016.
KOBZEVA, Liana; GRIBOV, Evgeny; KUZNETSOV, Ivan. Creating a Web Infrastructure of the Regional Innovation Ecosystem in the Triple Helix Model in Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 52, p. 72–79, 2012.
KORTELAINEN, S.; JÄRVI, K. Ecosystems: systematic literature review and framework development. In: XXV ISPIM Conference – Innovation for Sustainable Economy & Society. Dublin, Ireland, jun, 2014.
KURATKO, D. F. Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, & practice. Mason: Cengage Learning. 2017. 624 p.
LESTER, R.; PIORE, M. Innovation - The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.: Harvard University Press, 2006.
LETEN, B. et al. IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, A PUBLIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN NANO-ELECTRONICS. California Management Review, v. 55, n. 4, p. 51-64. 2013.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; ETZKOWITZ, H. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy,v. 25, p.195-203.1998.
MA, L. et al. The Impact of Local Government Policy on Innovation Ecosystem in Knowledge Resource Scarce Region: Case Study of Changzhou, China. Science Technology and Society, v. 24, n. 1, p. 29-52. 2019.
MANIKAS, K., HANSEN, K. Software Ecosystems – A Systematic Literature Review. The Journal of Systems and Software. p 1294-1306, 2013
MARKKULA, M.; KUNE, H. Making Smart Regions Smarter: Smart Specialization and the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 7-15. 2015.
MAYA-CARRILLO, A. M. et al. Opportunity entrepreneurship in the context of the change of the productive matrix: an innovative strategy - ecuador. Vision Gerencial, v. 15, n. 2, p. 305-328. 2016.
MCADAM, M.; MILLER, K.; MCADAM, R. Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, v. 50-51, p. 69-78. 2016.
MEOLI, M., PALEARI, S. VISMARA, S. The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin off. Small Business Economics. 2017.
MILLER, K. et al. Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: an absorptive capacity perspective. R & D Management, v. 46, n. 2, p. 383-399. 2016.
MOORE, J. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review. 71, n. 2, May-June, p. 75-86, 1993.
MOORE, J. The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: HarperBusiness. 1996
NAMAAYANDE, P.; KHAMSEH, A. Innovation ecosystem for SMES in ICT industry. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia-Journal of Management and Technology, v. 19, p. 141-159. 2019.
NELSON, R. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, [s. l.], v. 19, n.3, p. 193–214, 1990.
NELSON, R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York & Oxford, 1993. 543 p.
NEITH, L. et al. Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes. European Planning Studies, v. 26, n. 11, p. 2147–2166, 2018.
OH, D. S., PHILLIPS, F., PARK, S., LEE, E. Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, p. 1–6. 2016.
PARK, H.W.; LEYDESDORFF, L. Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry– government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy. v. 39, n. 5, p. 640-649, 2010.
PAVITT, Keith. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, v. 13, p. 343-373, 1984.
PIQUE, J. M.; BERBEGAL-MIRABENT, J.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple Helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation: the case of Silicon Valley. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 21. 2018.
PORTER, M. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990
PRITCHARD,A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, v.25, n.4, p.348-349, 1969.
RANGA, M.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, IP Publishing Ltd, v. 27, n. 4, p. 237–262, 2013.
RAMPERSAD, G. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A governance perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, v.7(3), p. 1122–1134. 2016.
RADICIC, D.; PUGH, G.; DOUGLAS, D. Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, v. 54, n. 1, p. 257-283. 2020.
RAJAHONKA, M. et al. Orchestrators of Innovation-Driven Regional Development: Experiences from the INNOFOCUS Project and Change 2020 Programme. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 52-62, 2015
REYNOLDS, E.; UYGUN, Y. Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 178–191, 2018.
SÁBATO, Jorge A.; BOTANA, Natalio R. La ciência y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la integración. Buenos Aires, n. 3, p. 15-36, nov. 1968.
SAUTTER, B. Futuring European industry: assessing the ManuFuture road towards EU re-industrialization. European Journal of Futures Research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 12, 2016.
SCHAEFFER, P. R.; FISCHER, B.; QUEIROZ, S. Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems. Foresight and Sti Governance, v. 12, n. 2, p. 50-61, 2018.
SCHWAB, K.; MARTÍN, X.. The global competitiveness report 2015-2016. World Economic Forum, 2015
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, New York, 1939.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. 1942.
TAMTIK, M. Innovation policy is a team sport - insight from non-governmental intermediaries in Canadian innovation ecosystem. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 19, 2018.
TEECE, D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance Strategic. management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. 2007.
TRISCHLER, J.; JOHNSON, M.; KRISTENSSON, P. A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations. Journal of Business Research, v. 116 (4), p. 552-560, 2020.
TUMELERO, C. et al. The role of networks in technological capability: a technology-based companies perspective. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, v. 8(1), p. 19, 2018.
UBREZIOVA, I. et al. Innovation ecosystems for the moldovan small and medium-sized enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, v.10(2), p. 298-312, 2020.
VALKOKARI, K. Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, v.5(8), 17–24., 2015.
VALKOKARI, K. et al. Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 7, n. 3, p. 12-24, 2017.
YILMAZ, L. Toward Multi-Level, Multi-Theoretical Model Portfolios for Scientific Enterprise Workforce Dynamics. Jasss-the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, v. 14, n. 4, p. 6, 2011.
ZELENY, M; CORNET, R; STONER, J. Management challenges in the 1990. In: HENNESSY, J.E.; ROBINS, S. Managing Toward the Millennium. New York: Fordham, University Press, v.10 (2), p. 3-65, 1991.
ADNER, R, KAPOOR, R. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: How the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, vol. 33, n. 3, p. 306–333, 2010.
ALLAHAR, H.; BRATHWAITE, C. Business incubation as an instrument of innovation: the experience of South America and the Caribbean. International Journal of Innovation, v. 4, n. 2, p. 71-85, Jul-Dec 2016.
APPIO, F.; LIMA, M.; PAROUTIS, S. Understanding Smart Cities: Innovation ecosystems, technological advancements, and societal challenges. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 142, p. 1-14, 2019.
ARCHIBUGI, D.; CESARATTO, S; SIRILLI, G. Sources of innovative activities and industrial organization in Italy. Research Policy, v.20, p. 299-313, 1991.
AUDRETSCH, D. et al. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: economic, technological, and societal impacts. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 2, p. 313-325, 2019.
AUDRETSCH, D., LEHMANN, E., MENTER, M. Public cluster policy and new venture creation. Economia e Politica Industriale, 43(4), p. 357–381, 2016.
AUDRETSCH, D. B., LINK, A. N. Embracing an entrepreneurial ecosystem: An analysis of the governance of research joint ventures. Small Business Economics. 52 (2), p. 429-436, 2017.
BACCARNE, B. et al. Governing Quintuple Helix Innovation: Urban Living Labs and Socio-Ecological Entrepreneurship. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 22-30, 2016.
BENGTSSON, M. ; KOCK, S. Competition in Business Networks to Cooperate and Compete Simultaneously. Industrial Marketing Management, 14, 178-193. 2000.
BOSCH, J., BOSCH-SIJTSEMA, P. From Integration to Composition: On the Impact of Software Product Lines, Global Development and Ecosystems. The Journal of Systems and Software. p 67-76. 2010.
BOSCH, J. ; BOSCH-SIJTSEMA, P. ESAO: A holistic Ecosystem-Driven Analysis Model. C. Lassenius and K. Smolander (Eds.) Software Business. Towards Continuous Value Delivery. Anais 5th International Conference, ICSOB 2014, Paphos, Cyprus, June 16-18, vol. 182. p. 79 – 93. 2014.
BROWN, R. Mission impossible? Entrepreneurial universities and peripheral regional innovation systems. Industry and Innovation, v. 23, n. 2, p. 189-205, 2016.
BROWN, R; MASON, C. Looking inside the spiky bits: A critical review and conceptualisation of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics, p. 11–30, 2017.
CARAYANNIS, E; CAMPBELL, D. ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management. v. 46, nº. 3-4, p. 201-234, 2009.
CARAYANNIS, E; CAMPBELL, D. Triple Helix, Quadruple Helix and Quintuple Helix and how do knowledge, innovation and the environment relate to each other?: a proposed framework for a trans-disciplinary analysis of sustainable development and social ecology. International Journal of Social Ecology and Sustainable Development (IJSESD), v. 1, n. 1, p. 41-69, 2010.
CARAYANNIS, E.; CAMPBELL, D. Open Innovation Diplomacy and a 21st Century Fractal Research, Education and Innovation (FREIE) Ecosystem: Building on the Quadruple and Quintuple Helix Innovation Concepts and the “Mode 3” Knowledge Production System. Journal of Knowledge Economic. v. 2, p. 327–372, 2011.
CARAYANNIS, E; BARTH, T; CAMPBELL, D. The Quintuple Helix innovation model: global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation . Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. v. 1. 2, 2012.
CARAYANNIS, E. G.; RAKHMATULLIN, R. The Quadruple/Quintuple Innovation Helixes and Smart Specialisation Strategies for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth in Europe and Beyond. Journal of Knowledge Economic. v. 5, p. 212–239, 2014.
CARAYANNIS, E; CAMPBELL, D; REHMAN, S. Mode 3 knowledge production: systems and systems theory, clusters and networks. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship. p 5 -17, 2016
CHESBROUGH, H. Open innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. USA: HBS Press Book, 2003a. 272p.
CHESBROUGH, H. The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44 (Spring 2003), p. 35-41. 2003b.
CHESBROUGH, H.; APPLEYARD, M. Open innovation and strategy. California management review. v.50, Nº 1, p. 57-76, 2007.
CLAUDEL, M. From Organizations to Organizational Fields: The Evolution of Civic Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 8, n. 6, p. 34-47, 2018.
COHEN, W; FLORIDA, R; GOE, W. University-Industry Research Centers in the United States. Pittsburgh: Carnegie Mellon University, p.111 – 133, 1994.
COLOMBO, M., DAGNINO, G., LEHMANN, E., SALMADOR, M. The governance of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Small Business Economics. v.52, p. 419-428, 2017.
COLOMBELLI, A., PAOLUCCI, E., UGHETTO, E. Hierarchical and relational governance and the life cycle of entrepreneurial ecosystems, Small Business Economics, v. 52, p.505-521 2017.
CUNNINGHAM, J., MENTER, M., WIRSCHING, K. Entrepreneurial ecosystem governance: A principal investigator centered governance framework. Small Business Economics, v.52, p. 545- 562, 2017.
CUNNINGHAM, J., MENTER, M, O’KANE, C. Value creation in the quadruple helix: A micro level conceptual model of principal investigators as value creators. R&D Management, p. 136–147. 2018.
DATTEE, B.; ALEXY, O.; AUTIO, E. Maneuvering in poor visibility: how firms play the ecosystem game when uncertainty is high. Academy of Management Journal, v. 61, n. 2, p. 466-498, 2018.
DEDEHAYIR, O; MÄKINEN, S. J; ORTT, J. R. Roles during innovation ecosystem genesis: A literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v.136, p.18-29, 2018.
DE SILVA, Muthu; HOWELLS, Jeremy; MEYER, Martin. Innovation intermediaries and collaboration: Knowledge–based practices and internal value creation. Research Policy, v. 47, n. 1, p. 70-87, 2018.
DI DIO, F.; CORREANI, L. Quality-improving and cost-reducing strategic alliances. Economia Política, v. 37, n. 2, p. 493-524, 2020.
DOSI, G. Technological paradigms and technological trajectories. Research Policy. v.
11, n. 3, p. 147-162, 1982.
DUBINI, P. The influence of motivations and environment on business start-ups: Some hints for public policies. Journal of business venturing, Elsevier, v. 4, n. 1, p. 11–26, 1989.
EDQUIST, C.; HOMMEN, L. Small country innovation systems: globalization, change and policy in Asia and Europe. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing, 2008. 544 p.
ETZKOWITZ, H. The triple helix: Academic-industry-government relations - Implications for the New York regional innovation environment. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. v. 787, p. 67-86, 1996
ETZKOWITZ, H. Innovation in innovation: the triple helix of University- Industry- Government Relations. Social Science Information, Paris, v. 42, n. 3, p. 293- 337. 2003.
ETZKOWITZ, H. Silicon Valley at risk? Sustainability of a global innovation icon: An introduction to the Special Issue: Silicon Valley: Global model or unique anomaly/Numéro spécial: La Silicon Valley: Modèle global ou anomalie singulière, Social Science Information, 52 (4), p. 515-538. 2013
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix—University-Industry-Government relations: A laboratory for knowledge based economic development. EASST Review, v. 14, p. 14–19. 1995.
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The Triple Helix as a Model for Innovation Studies. (Conference Report), Science & Public Policy, Vol. 25(3), p. 195-203,1998.
ETZKOWITZ, H; LEYDESDORFF, L. The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and ‘Mode 2’ to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy v.29, p. 109-123, 2000.
FELD, B. Startup Communities: Building an Entrepreneurial Ecosystem in Your City. Wiley, 2012. 212p.
FERDINAND, J. P.; MEYER, U. The social dynamics of heterogeneous innovation ecosystems: Effects of openness on community-firm relations. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, v. 9, p. 16, 2017.
GARELLI, S. Top class competitors: How nations, firms and individuals succeed in the new world of competitiveness. Chichester, Wiley, 2006. 272 p
GAWER, A. Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, v. 43, n. 7, p. 1239-1249, 2014.
GLÄNZEL, W., SCHOEPFLIN, U., A Bibliometric Study on Ageing and Reception Processes of Scientific Literature. Journal of Information Science, v. 21 (1), p. 37-53. 1995.
GUERRERO, M.; URBANO, D. Effectiveness of technology transfer policies and legislation in fostering entrepreneurial innovations across continents: an overview. Journal of Technology Transfer, v. 44, n. 5, p. 1347-1366, 2019.
IANSISTI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as ecology. Harvard Business Review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 1-11, 2004.
LETEN, B. et al. IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, A PUBLIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN NANO-ELECTRONICS. California Management Review, v. 55, n. 4, p. 51-64. 2013.
HAKALA, H. et al. Re-storying the Business, Innovation and Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Concepts: The Model-Narrative Review Method. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 22, n. 1, p. 10-32. 2020.
HWANG, V. W.; HOROWITT, G. The Rainforest - the secret to building the next Silicon Valley. Los Altos Hills: Regenwald, 2012.
IANSITI, M.; LEVIEN, R. Strategy as Ecology. Harvard business review, v. 82, n. 3, p. 68-81, 2004 a.
ISENBERG, D. The big idea: How to start and entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review, p. 40–50. 2010.
ISENBERG, D. The Entrepreneurship Ecosystem Strategy as a New Paradigm for Economic Policy: Principles for Cultivating Entrepreneurship. Dublin: Institute of International European Affairs, 2011a.
ISENBERG, D. Introducing the entrepreneurship ecosystem: Four defining characteristics. Forbes, May, v. 25, 2011b.
ISENBERG, D. What an Entrepreneurship Ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review, 5, p. 1–7. 324, 2014.
ISENBERG, D. J. Applying the Ecosystem Metaphor to Entrepreneurship: Uses and abuses. The Antitrust Bulletin, v. 61(4), p. 564–573. 2016.
JACOBIDES, M.; CENNAMO, C.; GAWER, A. Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, v. 39, n. 8, p. 2255-2276. 2018.
JUCEVICIUS, G. et al. The Emerging Innovation Ecosystems and "Valley of Death": Towards the Combination of Entrepreneurial and Institutional Approaches. Inzinerine Ekonomika-Engineering Economics, v. 27, n. 4, p. 430-438. 2016.
KOBZEVA, Liana; GRIBOV, Evgeny; KUZNETSOV, Ivan. Creating a Web Infrastructure of the Regional Innovation Ecosystem in the Triple Helix Model in Russia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, v. 52, p. 72–79, 2012.
KORTELAINEN, S.; JÄRVI, K. Ecosystems: systematic literature review and framework development. In: XXV ISPIM Conference – Innovation for Sustainable Economy & Society. Dublin, Ireland, jun, 2014.
KURATKO, D. F. Entrepreneurship: Theory, process, & practice. Mason: Cengage Learning. 2017. 624 p.
LESTER, R.; PIORE, M. Innovation - The Missing Dimension. Cambridge, Massachusetts, U.S.A.: Harvard University Press, 2006.
LETEN, B. et al. IP Models to Orchestrate Innovation Ecosystems: IMEC, A PUBLIC RESEARCH INSTITUTE IN NANO-ELECTRONICS. California Management Review, v. 55, n. 4, p. 51-64. 2013.
LEYDESDORFF, L.; ETZKOWITZ, H. The Triple Helix as a model for innovation studies. Science and Public Policy,v. 25, p.195-203.1998.
MA, L. et al. The Impact of Local Government Policy on Innovation Ecosystem in Knowledge Resource Scarce Region: Case Study of Changzhou, China. Science Technology and Society, v. 24, n. 1, p. 29-52. 2019.
MANIKAS, K., HANSEN, K. Software Ecosystems – A Systematic Literature Review. The Journal of Systems and Software. p 1294-1306, 2013
MARKKULA, M.; KUNE, H. Making Smart Regions Smarter: Smart Specialization and the Role of Universities in Regional Innovation Ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 7-15. 2015.
MAYA-CARRILLO, A. M. et al. Opportunity entrepreneurship in the context of the change of the productive matrix: an innovative strategy - ecuador. Vision Gerencial, v. 15, n. 2, p. 305-328. 2016.
MCADAM, M.; MILLER, K.; MCADAM, R. Situated regional university incubation: A multi-level stakeholder perspective. Technovation, v. 50-51, p. 69-78. 2016.
MEOLI, M., PALEARI, S. VISMARA, S. The governance of universities and the establishment of academic spin off. Small Business Economics. 2017.
MILLER, K. et al. Knowledge transfer in university quadruple helix ecosystems: an absorptive capacity perspective. R & D Management, v. 46, n. 2, p. 383-399. 2016.
MOORE, J. Predators and Prey: A New Ecology of Competition. Harvard Business Review. 71, n. 2, May-June, p. 75-86, 1993.
MOORE, J. The death of competition: leadership and strategy in the age of business ecosystems. New York: HarperBusiness. 1996
NAMAAYANDE, P.; KHAMSEH, A. Innovation ecosystem for SMES in ICT industry. Revista Gestão & Tecnologia-Journal of Management and Technology, v. 19, p. 141-159. 2019.
NELSON, R. Capitalism as an engine of progress. Research Policy, [s. l.], v. 19, n.3, p. 193–214, 1990.
NELSON, R. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, New York & Oxford, 1993. 543 p.
NEITH, L. et al. Embedding entrepreneurial regional innovation ecosystems: reflecting on the role of effectual entrepreneurial discovery processes. European Planning Studies, v. 26, n. 11, p. 2147–2166, 2018.
OH, D. S., PHILLIPS, F., PARK, S., LEE, E. Innovation ecosystems: A critical examination. Technovation, 54, p. 1–6. 2016.
PARK, H.W.; LEYDESDORFF, L. Longitudinal trends in networks of university–industry– government relations in South Korea: The role of programmatic incentives. Research Policy. v. 39, n. 5, p. 640-649, 2010.
PAVITT, Keith. Sectoral patterns of technical change: Towards taxonomy and a theory. Research Policy, v. 13, p. 343-373, 1984.
PIQUE, J. M.; BERBEGAL-MIRABENT, J.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple Helix and the evolution of ecosystems of innovation: the case of Silicon Valley. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 21. 2018.
PORTER, M. The competitive advantage of nations. New York: The Free Press, 1990
PRITCHARD,A. Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, v.25, n.4, p.348-349, 1969.
RANGA, M.; ETZKOWITZ, H. Triple helix systems: an analytical framework for innovation policy and practice in the knowledge society. Industry and Higher Education, IP Publishing Ltd, v. 27, n. 4, p. 237–262, 2013.
RAMPERSAD, G. Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A governance perspective. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, v.7(3), p. 1122–1134. 2016.
RADICIC, D.; PUGH, G.; DOUGLAS, D. Promoting cooperation in innovation ecosystems: evidence from European traditional manufacturing SMEs. Small Business Economics, v. 54, n. 1, p. 257-283. 2020.
RAJAHONKA, M. et al. Orchestrators of Innovation-Driven Regional Development: Experiences from the INNOFOCUS Project and Change 2020 Programme. Technology Innovation Management Review, p. 52-62, 2015
REYNOLDS, E.; UYGUN, Y. Strengthening advanced manufacturing innovation ecosystems: The case of Massachusetts. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, v. 136, p. 178–191, 2018.
SÁBATO, Jorge A.; BOTANA, Natalio R. La ciência y la tecnología en el desarrollo futuro de América Latina. Revista de la integración. Buenos Aires, n. 3, p. 15-36, nov. 1968.
SAUTTER, B. Futuring European industry: assessing the ManuFuture road towards EU re-industrialization. European Journal of Futures Research, v. 4, n. 1, p. 12, 2016.
SCHAEFFER, P. R.; FISCHER, B.; QUEIROZ, S. Beyond Education: The Role of Research Universities in Innovation Ecosystems. Foresight and Sti Governance, v. 12, n. 2, p. 50-61, 2018.
SCHWAB, K.; MARTÍN, X.. The global competitiveness report 2015-2016. World Economic Forum, 2015
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Business Cycles: A Theoretical, Historical, and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process. McGraw-Hill Book Company Inc, New York, 1939.
SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers. 1942.
TAMTIK, M. Innovation policy is a team sport - insight from non-governmental intermediaries in Canadian innovation ecosystem. Triple Helix, v. 5, n. 1, p. 19, 2018.
TEECE, D. Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance Strategic. management journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. 2007.
TRISCHLER, J.; JOHNSON, M.; KRISTENSSON, P. A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations. Journal of Business Research, v. 116 (4), p. 552-560, 2020.
TUMELERO, C. et al. The role of networks in technological capability: a technology-based companies perspective. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, v. 8(1), p. 19, 2018.
UBREZIOVA, I. et al. Innovation ecosystems for the moldovan small and medium-sized enterprises. Marketing and Management of Innovations, v.10(2), p. 298-312, 2020.
VALKOKARI, K. Business, Innovation, and Knowledge Ecosystems: How They Differ and How to Survive and Thrive within Them. Technology Innovation Management Review, v.5(8), 17–24., 2015.
VALKOKARI, K. et al. Orchestrating Innovation Ecosystems: A Qualitative Analysis of Ecosystem Positioning Strategies. Technology Innovation Management Review, v. 7, n. 3, p. 12-24, 2017.
YILMAZ, L. Toward Multi-Level, Multi-Theoretical Model Portfolios for Scientific Enterprise Workforce Dynamics. Jasss-the Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, v. 14, n. 4, p. 6, 2011.
ZELENY, M; CORNET, R; STONER, J. Management challenges in the 1990. In: HENNESSY, J.E.; ROBINS, S. Managing Toward the Millennium. New York: Fordham, University Press, v.10 (2), p. 3-65, 1991.
Publicado
2021-10-14
Seção
Artigos
A submissão de originais para este periódico implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação impressa e digital. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Em virtude de sermos um periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais, científicas, não comerciais, desde que citada a fonte (por favor, veja a Licença Creative Commons no rodapé desta página).
