ARCHETYPES IN METACONCEPT STRUCTURE

Fisenko   Olga S.; Nazartseva  Ekaterina A.; Zharkova  Elena Kh

Fisenko Olga S. University of Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4757-9588
Nazartseva Ekaterina A. University of Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3490-7271
Zharkova Elena Kh Moscow State Institute of International Relations MGIMO(U) https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4732-2915

Resumo

The history of studying the cognitive structure of our consciousness and its minimal mental unit dates back to the beginning of the 20th century and is associated with the name of the Russian Scientist S.А. Askoldov, the scientific legacy of whom was not actually forgotten during the Soviet period. Appealing to the methods of representation of knowledge about the world has aroused interest in the concept category. The basics which reflect primary human values are metaconcept. The present paper proves that the basis of the structure of the meta concept is an archetype.

Biografia do Autor

Fisenko Olga S., University of Russia

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation.

Nazartseva Ekaterina A., University of Russia

Peoples' Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University), Moscow, Russian Federation.

Zharkova Elena Kh, Moscow State Institute of International Relations MGIMO(U)

Moscow State Institute of International Relations MGIMO(U), Moscow, Russian Federation.

Referências

Askoldov, S.A. (1997). Concept and word. Russian literature. From the theory of literature to the structure of the text. Anthology. – M.: Academia. 267–279.
Averintsev, S.S. (1980). Archetypes. Myths of the World: Encyclopedia, 556-559.
Bazylev, V.N. (2000). The mythology of boredom in Russian culture. RES LINGVISTIKA. Digest of articles. To the 60th anniversary of Professor V.P. Nereznaka. – M., 130–147.
Boldyrev, N.N. (2002). Cognitive semantics: A course of lectures on English philology. Tambov: TSU. 123-137.
Bolshakova, A.Y. (2012). Archetype Theory and Conceptology. http: //www.crjournal. ru/rus/journals/109.html &j_id = 9.
Gafarova, G.V., Kildibekova, T.A. (1998). Cognitive aspects of the lexical system of the language. Ufa: Bashkirs. Un – t, 180.
Pimenova, M.V. (2002). Ethnogenetic aspect of conceptual research. Sociocultural Hermeneutics: problems and prospects. – Kemerovo: Graphics, 116 –119.
Veremieva, A.A. (1996). Introduction to Cultural Studies. Training allowance. – M, Vlados, 336-340.
Karasik, V.I. (2001). On the categories of linguo culturology. Language personality: problems of communicative activity. – Volgograd: Change, 3-16.
Kolesov, V.V. (1999). Life comes from the word .... – SPb.: Zlatoust, p. 368.
Korneeva, A.Y. (2003). On the formation of cognitive linguistics as an independent scientific disciplines. Russian word in world culture. – SPb: Polytechnic, 250–256.
Kostomarov, V.G., Burvikova, N.D. (2000). Modern Russian language and cultural memory. Ethnocultural specificity of speech activity. – M., 23-36.
Likhachev, S.D. (1997). The conceptual sphere of the Russian language. Russian literature. From the theory of literature to text structure. Anthology. – M.: Academia. 280–289.
Nikitin, M.V. (2004). Detailed theses about concepts. Questions of cognitive linguistics. Tambov, 1, 53–64.
Popova, Z.D., & Sternin, I.A. (2001). Essays on cognitive linguistics. – Voronezh: Origins, p. 191.
Popova, Z.D., & Sternin, I.A. (2003). The problem of modeling concepts in linguistic-cognitive Studies. Human World and the World of the Language: Collective Monograph. – Kemerovo: IPK “Graphics”. 6-17.
Rudakova, A.V. (2004). Cognitive science and cognitive linguistics. –Voronezh: Origins, 80,-90.
Constants, S.Y. (1997). Dictionary of Russian culture. – M.: Languages of Russian culture, p. 811-824.
Vorkachev, S.G. (2001). Concept of happiness: conceptual and figurative components. News of the Russian Academy of Sciences. A series of literature and language, 6096), 47–58.
Vorobev, V.V. (1997). Linguoculturology (theory and methods). – M.: RUDN, 331, -340.