THE ACTION RESEARCH IN MANAGEMENT OF INNOVATION
Resumen
A fundamental methodological question guides this paper: how can managers and researchers of innovation learn from action research method? To address this question, we first state theoretical and empirical studies confirm action research methodology is useful for management of innovation, then we define and explore the characteristics and process of action research and value of it. In this paper, we review the papers about action research methodology, theoretical or empirical, relevant and valid for management of innovation and outline the action research cycle models related to management of innovation. In addition, we discuss about the philosophy of this method and describe the researcher skills required to engage in action research.
Citas
Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & Smith, D. M. (1985). Action science: Jossey-Bass San Francisco.
Becker, M. C. (2004). Organizational routines: a review of the literature. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(4), 643-678.
Bentz, V. M., & Shapiro, J. J. (1998). Mindful inquiry in social research: Sage.
Bunning, C. (1995). Placing action learning and action research in context. International Management Centre, Brisbane, Australia.
Calhoun, E. F. (1994). How To Use Action Research in the Self-Renewing School: ERIC.
Canterino, F., Shani, A. B., Coghlan, D., & Brunelli, M. S. (2016). Collaborative management research as a modality of action research: learning from a merger-based study. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(2), 157-186.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London and New York: Falmer.
Collier, J. (1945). Social research/an international quarterly of social sciences. New York, Graduate fac, 12, 275-276.
Coriat, B., & Dosi, G. (1998). Learning how to govern and learning how to solve problems: on the co-evolution of competences, conflicts, and organizational routines.
Dick, R. (1993). You Want to Do an Action Research Thesis?: How to Conduct and Report Action Research,(including a Beginner's Guide to the Literature): Interchange.
Dosi, G. (1988). Sources, procedures, and microeconomic effects of innovation. Journal of economic literature, 1120-1171.
Gadamer, H.-G., Weinsheimer, J., & Marshall, D. G. (2004). EPZ Truth and Method: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.
Grudens-Schuck, N. (1998). When farmers design curriculum: Participatory education for sustainable agriculture in Ontario, Canada: Cornell University, Aug.
Grundy, S., & Kemmis, S. (1982). Educational action research in Australia: The state of the art (an overview). The action research reader, 3, 321-335.
Gummesson, E. (2000). Qualitative methods in management research: Sage.
Gustavsen, B. (1992). Dialogue and development: theory of communication, action research and the restructuring of working life: Van Gorcum Assen.
Hart, E., & Bond, M. (1995). Action research for health and social care: A guide to practice: Taylor & Francis.
Holter, I. M., & Schwartz‐Barcott, D. (1993). Action Research: What is it? How has it been used and how can it be used in nursing? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 18(2), 298-304.
Hopper, T. F. (1996). Learning To Teach Games for Understanding: Coming To Know the Action Research Process.
Jelinek, M. (1979). Institutionalizing innovation: A study of organizational learning systems: Praeger Publishers.
Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (2000). Participatory Action Research. IN DENZIN, N. & LINCOLN, Y.(Eds.) Handbook of Qualitative Research: London, Sage Publications Inc.
Kilvington, M., Allen, W., & Kravchenko, C. (1999). Improving farmer motivation within Tb vector control. Unpublished Landcare Research Contract Report LC9899/110, Lincoln, New Zealand.
Kocher, P.-Y., Kaudela-Baum, S., & Wolf, P. (2011). Enhancing organisational innovation capability through systemic action research: a case of a Swiss SME in the food industry. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 24(1), 17-44.
Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of social issues, 2(4), 34-46.
Lewin, R. A. (1952). Studies on the flagella of algae. I. General observations on Chlamydomonas moewusii Gerloff. Biological Bulletin, 74-79.
Mair, J., & Marti, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44.
Mazigo, A. F. (2017). Promoting Social Innovation Through Action Research: Evidence from an Empirical Study in the Fisheries Sector of Ukerewe District in Tanzania. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 18(2), 239-257.
McNiff, J., & Whitehead, J. (2009). You and your action research project: Routledge.
Meyer, J. (1995). Action research-stages in the process: a personal account. Nurse Researcher, 2(3), 24-37.
Michael, D. N. (1995). Barriers and bridges to learning in a turbulent human ecology. Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, 461-485.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook: Sage.
Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (2009). An evolutionary theory of economic change: Harvard University Press.
Ottosson, S. (2003). Participation action research-: A key to improved knowledge of management. Technovation, 23(2), 87-94.
Reason, P., & Bradbury, H. (2001). Handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice: Sage.
Reason, P. E. (1994). Participation in human inquiry: Sage Publications, Inc.
Salehi, F., & Yaghtin, A. (2015). Action research innovation cycle: Lean thinking as a transformational system. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 293-302.
Somekh, B. (1995). The contribution of action research to development in social endeavours: a position paper on action research methodology. British Educational Research Journal, 21(3), 339-355.
Suojanen, U. (2001). Action research.
Susman, G. I., & Evered, R. D. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative science quarterly, 582-603.
Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509-533.
Tinning, R. (1992). Reading action research: Notes on knowledge and human interests. Quest, 44(1), 1-14.
Tzeng, C.-H. (2009). A review of contemporary innovation literature: A Schumpeterian perspective. Innovation, 11(3), 373-394.
Van Beinum, H. (1998). On the practice of action research. Concepts and Transformation, 3(1-2), 1-29.
Van Beinum, H., Faucheux, C., & Van der Vlist, R. (1996). Reflections on the epigenetic significance of action research. Beyond Theory: Changing Organizations through Participation. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Wang, C. L., & Ahmed, P. K. (2007). Dynamic capabilities: A review and research agenda. International journal of management reviews, 9(1), 31-51.
Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & De Koning, K. (2000). Action research: a systematic review and guidance for assessment. Health technology assessment (Winchester, England), 5(23), iii-157.
Wortley, S. (1996). Business as usual or action research in practice. Action Research Electronic Reader.
Yström, A. E., Ollila, S., Agogue, M., & Coghlan, D. (2017). Developing a Learning Method in an Open Innovation Project Through Action Research. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Proceedings.
A submissão de originais para este periódico implica na transferência, pelos autores, dos direitos de publicação impressa e digital. Os direitos autorais para os artigos publicados são do autor, com direitos do periódico sobre a primeira publicação. Os autores somente poderão utilizar os mesmos resultados em outras publicações indicando claramente este periódico como o meio da publicação original. Em virtude de sermos um periódico de acesso aberto, permite-se o uso gratuito dos artigos em aplicações educacionais, científicas, não comerciais, desde que citada a fonte (por favor, veja a Licença Creative Commons no rodapé desta página).
