CRIMINOLOGY REVIEW PRINCIPLE OF CHASE MEASUREMENT

  • Farshid Asadi Islamic Azad University
  • Seyyed Sajjad Kazemi Malayer University
Palavras-chave: Chase. Chase measurement. Tagging Theory. Criminal Pragmatism. Criminal Fixing Inflation.

Resumo

The most important stages of criminal proceedings are prosecution that under the principles and theories of criminology, such as chase measurement, it can be investigated. The most important theories and criminology schools that are written about this principle are: A tagging theory that considers any criminal offense for unprofessional and casual offenders to be a factor in secondary delinquency. Differential criminal policy as well which sets out principles such as personalization of punishment and prosecution, will justify the principle of pursuit scrutiny. Witty's shame theory and social control, and generally sociological-based criminological theories, indicate that: The pursuit must be carried out in a carefully measured manner towards different individuals and in different social situations. The principle of pursuit is governed by rules such as "dare", the need to preserve Muslim dignity, Islamic amnesty, repentance, and so on in Islamic criminal law. Criminological theories, such as zero negligence, criticize the principle and do not place it in place because in this theory of criminology emphasis is on the most rigors. The principle of follow-up has left many positive results in criminal law; the most important of these works is the criminalization of dysfunction, the reform of the perpetrators and the prevention of injuries occurring during short-term imprisonment.

Biografia do Autor

Farshid Asadi, Islamic Azad University

Department of Law, Hamadan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Hamadan, Iran. 

Seyyed Sajjad Kazemi, Malayer University

Assistant Professor, Malayer University, Malayer, Iran Corresponding Auther. 

Referências

Amid, Hassan. (1994). Awesome Persian Culture. Tehran: Sepehr Publishing.
Dehans, Willem, Gholami, Hussein. (2008). Abolition and crime control: Contradiction in terms, Journal of Law and Policy, No. 24, pp. 323-338.
Gholami, Hossein. (2002). Restorative Justice, Tehran: Semat Publishing.
Gulldozian, Iraj. (2006). General Penal Code, Tehran, Mizan, p.
Haji Deh Abadi Mohammad Ali. (2009). Correction of Criminals in Iran's Legislative Criminal Law, Private Law Studies (Law). No. 3, p. 83-104.
Jafari Langroudi, Mohammad Jafar. (1995). Terminology of Law. Tehran: Ganj Danesh publishing house.
Khoy, Seyyed Abu Al-Qasim. (1987). The Basics of the Reproduction of Al-Mannhaj; Qom: Dar Al-Alam-Dar Al-Hadi School.
Muain, Mohammad. (1992). Farsi Culture, Tehran: Edna.
Najafi Ebrahandabadi, Ali Hossein. (2004). Criminology Curriculum vitae, Tehran: Shahid Beheshti University.
Najafi-Parad Abadi, Ali Hossein. (1998). Transcripts of the Lesson of Criminal Sociology. Tarbiat Modares University of Tehran.
Rahimi Nejad, Ismail. (2009). Human dignity in criminal law, Tehran: Publishing Mizan.
Sadeghi, Mohammad Hadi. (2005). Intervention of Extremism and Victims' Rights in Islamic Penal Law, Modares Journal of Humanities, No. 40, pp. 119-144.
Session, Jeffrey, Qasiasi, Jalaluddin. (2005). A Look at (Zero Policy negligence), Islamic Law Magazine, pp. 171-182.
Shahid Thani, Zayn al-Din bin Ali. (2017). Shirovi, Mahsa and Bashirieh, Tahmourth (2012), on the criminal responsibility of sexual misunderstandings in the light of criminological comments. Pages 91-136.the story of Al-Tha'im is the divine revelation of the Qur'an, Qom: The Encyclopedia of Islam.
Shams Natari, Mohammad Ibrahim. (2011). Characteristics of Crime in the Light of Human Rights Documents and Documents, Strategy No. 85, pp. 267-302.
Taliban, Mohammad Reza. (2004). Structural Covariance Analysis of Juvenile Delinquency ", Youth Journal Quarterly, No. 7, pp. 3-34.
Publicado
2019-10-10
Seção
Artigos