INVESTIGATING PRESERVICE ENGLISH LANGUAGE TEACHERS’ LEVEL OF ONLINE LEARNING BARRIERS

Keywords: Online learning. English language teaching. teacher training

Abstract

Although online learning could be perceived as a choice, it can become a necessity in time. This is the reason why teachers should also learn and practice online learning environments. Teaching English is already not easy because the use of the native language is minimal, and doing so online can be even more challenging. The aim of this study is to determine the levels of barriers to online learning among preservice English teachers. The Scale of Student Barriers Online Learning by Muilenburg and Berge (2005), adapted to the Turkish language and culture by Horzum et. al. (2017) was used in the study. 310 preservice English teachers participated in the study. Sub-factor averages, factor correlations were analyzed and diagnostic statistics about the study group were included. In the comparison of quantitative data, the t-test was used for variables with two sublevels and one-way ANOVA was used for variables with more than two sublevels. When the ANOVA test revealed a difference, Post-Hoc tests were used to determine the pairwise differences. The study concluded that the barrier factors that learners encounter in online learning environments are caused by the perceived structure, lack of interaction, and low levels of readiness for technology use.

References

ALQURASHİ, E. Predicting student satisfaction and perceived learning within online learning environments. Distance Education, 40(1), 133- 148, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553564
ARIKAN, R. Araştırma yöntem ve teknikleri. Nobel Yayıncılık, 2018.
Baturay, M. H., & Toker, S. An investigation of the impact of demographic factors on students’ e-learning readiness. Computers & Education, 141, 103614. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103614
BAX, S. CALL—past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28, 2003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(02)00071-4
BOZKURT, A., & SHARMA, R. C. Emergency remote teaching in a time of global crisis due to CoronaVirus pandemic. Asian Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 1-6, 2021. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3778083
BROWN, S. AND GREENGRASS, M. Research portals in the arts and humanities. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25(1), 1–21, 2010. doi:10.1093/llc/fqp032
BÜYÜKÖZTÜRK, Ş., ÇAKMAK, E. K., AKGÜN, Ö. E., KARADENİZ, Ş., & DEMİREL, F. Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri (17. bs.). Pegem Akademi, 2012.
CARR, S. As distance education comes of age, the challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39–A41, 2000. https://www.chronicle.com/article/As-Distance-Education-Comes-of/14334
CRESWELL, J. W. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications, 2010.
DURAK, G., & SARİTEPECİ, M. Investigating the effect of technology use in education on classroom management within the scope of the FATİH project. Cogent Education, 5(1), 1470487, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2018.1470487
GODWİN-JONES, R. Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3-17, 2017. https://dx.doi.org/10125/44607
GONZALEZ, T., DE LA RUBİA, M. A., HİNCZ, K. P., COMAS-LOPEZ, M., SUBİRATS, L., FORT, S., ET AL. Influence of COVID-19 confinement on students’ performance in higher education. PLoS ONE 15:e0239490, 2000. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239490
GOODİNG, P., TERRAS, M., AND WARWİCK, C. The myth of the new: mass digitization, distant reading, and the future of the book. Literary and Linguistic Computing, 28(4), 629–39, 2013. doi: 10.1093/llc/fqt051
GREİER, K., DRENOWATZ, C., & SAPPL, A. Gender differences in perceptions and attitudes of online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic: A Cross-sectional study in university students. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 3(2), 153-158, 2022. doi: 10.24018/ejedu.2022.3.2.314
HORZUM, M. B., DEMİR-KAYNAK, Z., VE CANAN-GÜNGÖREN, Ö. (2017). Çevrimiçi öğrenmede öğrenci engelleri ölçeği’nin Türkçe’ye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. AUAd, 3(2), 61-84. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/auad/issue/34117/378443#article_cite
KARA, A., & ÇUBUKÇU, Z. The effect of gender on motivation and student achievement in digital storytelling. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14(6), 2185- 2192, 2014. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2014.6.2312
KENNY, J. Student perceptions of the use of online learning technology in their courses, 2003. ultiBASE Articles. http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/ Articles/march03/kenny2.pdf.
LİU, G. Z., WU, N. W., AND CHEN, Y. W. Identifying emerging trends for implementing learning technology in special education: a state-of-the-art review of selected articles published in 2008-2012. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34(10), 3618–28, 2013b. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.007
MALTBY, J. R., & WHİTTLE, J. (2000). Learning programming online: Student perceptions and performance. Proceedings of the ASCILITE 2000 Conference http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/coffs00/papers/john_maltby.pdf
MEANS, B., TOYAMA, Y., MURPHY, R., BAKİA, M., & JONES, K. (2013). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record, 115(3), 1-47. https://www.sri.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/effectiveness_of_online_and_blended_learning.pdf
MUFLİH, S., ABUHAMMAD, S., AL-AZZAM, S., ALZOUBİ, H. K., MUFLİH, M., & KARASNEH, R. (2021). Online learning for undergraduate health Professional education during COVID-19: Jordanian medical students’ attitudes and perceptions. Heliyon, 7(9), doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08031
MUİLENBURG, L. Y., & BERGE, Z. L. (2005). Student barriers to online learning: A factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910500081269
PHULPOTO, S. A. J., OAD, L., & IMRAN, M. (2024). Enhancing Teacher Performance in E-Learning: Addressing Barriers and Promoting Sustainable Education in Public Universities of Pakistan. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 8(1), 418–429. https://doi.org/10.47205/plhr.2024(8-I)38
RODRÍGUEZ-ARDURA, I., & MESEGUER-ARTOLA, A. (2021). Flow experiences in personalised e-learning environments and the role of gender and academic performance. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2019.1572628
TAGHIZADEH, M., & BASIRAT, M. (2022). Investigating pre-service EFL teachers’ attitudes and challenges of online teaching. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 37(7), 1937–1974. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2022.2136201
WANG, Y., WU, J., CHEN, F., & Lİ, J. (2024). Analyzing teaching effects of blended learning with LMS: An empirical investigation. in IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 42343-42356. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3352169.
YAN, L. R., JOSEPH, K. A. A/P, HAMZAH, F. A., & İSMAİL, H. H. (2024). Benefits and challenges of online teaching and learning among upper primary ESL students: The teachers’ Perspectives. International Journal of Academic Research in Business & Social Issues, 14(10), 1821-1834. doi:10.6007/IJARBSS/v14-i10/23282
Published
2026-02-04