THE EVOLUTION OF APPROACHES TO ELECTORAL PROCESSES IN THE CONTEXT OF THEORIES OF POLITICAL PARTICIPATION IN THE 21ST CENTURY

Auteur/ices

Mots-clés :

Political participation. Electoral processes. Voting behavior. Democratic governance. Electoral reforms.

Résumé

In the context of global transformations of democratic regimes and the growing crisis of political legitimacy, the study of political participation is increasingly relevant. Using an interdisciplinary approach that combines quantitative and qualitative methods, including literature review (Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar) and analysis of IFES, World Bank, European Parliament, and EIGE reports, the research develops a model for assessing twenty-first-century political participation. Key evolutionary stages of participation theories are identified: institutional-behavioral (early 2000s), communicative-network (2010–2015), identity-existential (2015–2020), and post-institutional crisis-reflective (2020–present). Modern political mobilization is increasingly flexible, hybrid, emotional, and digitally mediated, requiring new theoretical frameworks. A critical classification of participation theories—liberal-elite, participatory, resource-mobilization, digital-network, radical-democratic, postcolonial, and resilient—reveals diverse citizen engagement patterns. The proposed Analytical Model covers institutional, socio-cultural, digital-communicative, and semantic-existential dimensions, highlighting a paradigm shift from formal to value-driven, identity-based, and digitally mediated participation, reshaping approaches to legitimacy, representativeness, and civic engagement.

Références

Aceron J (2024) 6 new frontiers of citizen participation: strengthening public accountability through synergy. Exploring New Frontiers of Citizen Participation in the Policy Cycle, Discussion Paper, OECD Global Forum on Building Trust and Reinforcing Democracy, pp. 134–136. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/about/programmes/reinforcing-democracy-initiative/Exploring-New-Frontiers-of-Citizen-Participation-Discussion-Paper.pdf

Aichholzer G, Rose G (2019) Experience with digital tools in different types of e-participation. In: European E-Democracy in Practice, pp. 93–140. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27184-8_4

Alodat AM, Al-Qora’n LF, Abu Hamoud M (2023) Social media platforms and political participation: a study of Jordanian youth engagement. Social Sciences, 12(7): 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci12070402

Arapovic A (2021) Civil participation in decision-making process in Bosnia and Herzegovina – general overview. Council of Europe. https://rm.coe.int/baseline-study-civil-participation-in-decision-making-process-in-bih/1680a4d006

Ariel Y, Elishar V (2025) Political communication and the hype cycle: tracing its evolution across the digital era. Journalism and Media, 6(2): 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/journalmedia6020087

Asimakopoulos G, Antonopoulou H, Giotopoulos K, Halkiopoulos C (2025) Impact of information and communication technologies on democratic processes and citizen participation. Societies, 15(2): 40. https://doi.org/10.3390/soc15020040

Bárta O, Boldt G, Lavizzari A (2021) Meaningful youth political participation in Europe: concepts, patterns and policy implications. Council of Europe and European Commission. https://pjp-eu.coe.int/documents/42128013/47261953/PREMS+149821+GBR+2600+Study+on+Youth+political+participation+WEB+16x24+%281%29.pdf/d2ecb223-edda-a9d2-30f7-c77692a086bd

Barton B (2002) Underlying concepts and theoretical issues in public participation in resources development. In: Human Rights in Natural Resource Development: Public Participation in the Sustainable Development of Mining and Energy Resources, pp. 77–120. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199253784.003.0003

Batalov O, Semyboroda K (2024) Political participation: from antiquity to the present. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, 46: 88–94. https://periodicals.karazin.ua/politology/article/view/26340

Becker J (2019) Cultural backlash: Trump, Brexit, and authoritarian populism. International Affairs, 95(5): 1168–1169. https://doi.org/10.1093/ia/iiz097

Bennett WL, Segerberg A (2016) The logic of connective action: digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. International Journal of Communication, 2. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/9970.003.0006

Birch S (2010) Perceptions of electoral fairness and voter turnout. Comparative Political Studies, 43(12): 1601–1622. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414010374021

Brunetti AL, Boyer MM, Plescia C (2025) The empirical consequences. In: The Meanings of Voting for Citizens, pp. 155–184. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780198946335.003.0010

Brunner RD, Lynch AH (2017) Adaptive governance. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.601

Chornenkyi O (2023) Social media and their effect on political participation. 44(44): 41–48. https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-8089-2023-44-05

Chung ML, Chiu EMP, Kwok YH, Fung K-w (2025) To bond or bridge: how do populist attitudes intensify the effect of online social capital on political engagement? Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04700-7

Ciftci D (2020) The adaptation of ELM-model in motivation for boycotting: a case of political consumerism. Dördüncü Kuvvet Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi: 40–56. https://doi.org/10.33464/dorduncukuvvet.728824

CISR (2019) Public opinion survey of residents of Ukraine. Center for Insights in Survey Research (CISR). https://www.iri.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/july_2019_ukraine_poll.pdf

Claud FA (2024) Effects of social media algorithms on the political perspectives of 4th year political science students. International Journal of Political Science and Public Administration, 4(1): 72–95. https://doi.org/10.51483/ijpspa.4.1.2024.72-95

D’Anieri P (2023) Power politics and the crisis of democracy: balance, hegemony, and the realpolitik of domestic politics. The Crisis of Democracy: Theoretical and Practical Issues in the Times of Systemic Antagonism. Ideology and Politics Journal, 1(23): 10–34. https://www.ideopol.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/05/IPJ-1-23-2023-ENG.-Full-text-1.pdf

Déri A, Szabó A (2025) Interpreting political participation as communicative action: a comparison of younger and older adults. Frontiers in Political Science, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpos.2025.1568369

Deželan T (2023) Young people's participation in European democratic processes. Classical models of political participation have a number of limitations that are becoming apparent in the 21st century. Requested by the AFCO committee. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/STUD/2023/745820/IPOL_STU(2023)745820_EN.pdf

EIGE (2025) Despite hopes for progress, European Parliament elections led to a decline in women’s representation. European Institute for Gender Equality. https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/dgs/data-talks/despite-hopes-progress-european-parliament-elections-led-decline-womens-representation?language_content_entity=en

Elfahdi M (2022) Political participation: beyond the vote. Chapman University Digital. https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/cusrd_abstracts/557

Engelen B (2008) Rationality and institutions: an inquiry into the normative implications of rational choice theory. Erasmus Journal for Philosophy and Economics, 1(1): 185. https://doi.org/10.23941/ejpe.v1i1.19

EP (2020) Women in parliaments. National parliaments with a higher proportion of women members than the EP. European Parliament. https://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2020/646189/EPRS_ATA(2020)646189_EN.pdf

Eurostat (2024) Migration and asylum in Europe – 2024 edition. Language selection. European Commission. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/interactive-publications/migration-2024#migration-to-the-eu

Folgueiras-Bertomeu P, Matta AA, Sandín-Esteban MP, Comet-Donoso M (2025) Meta-reflection on an applied hermeneutic phenomenology: methodological challenges of a study on young-women's political participation [71 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 26(2), Art. 18. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-26.2.4201

Gilman ME (2022) Beyond window dressing: public participation for marginalized communities in the datafied society. Fordham Law Review, 91(2). https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5965&context=flr

Giugni M, Grasso M (Eds.) (2022) The Oxford Handbook of Political Participation. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198861126.001.0001

Guziana B (2021) Only for citizens? Local political engagement in Sweden and inclusiveness of terms. Sustainability, 13(14): 7839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147839

Halupka M (2016) The rise of information activism: how to bridge dualisms and reconceptualise political participation. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10): 1487–1503. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2015.1119872

He B (2007) Voting behavior and political participation. In: Rural Democracy in China, pp. 67–85. Palgrave Macmillan US. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230607316_5

Helbing D, Mahajan S, Fricker RH, Musso A, Hausladen CI, Carissimo C, Carpentras D, Stockinger E, Argota Sanchez-Vaquerizo J, Yang JC, Ballandies MC, Korecki M, Dubey RK, Pournaras E (2023) Democracy by design: perspectives for digitally assisted, participatory upgrades of society. Journal of Computational Science, 71: 102061. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocs.2023.102061

Hinings CR, Tolbert PS (2007) Organizational institutionalism and sociology: a reflection. In: The SAGE Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 473–490. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849200387.n20

IDEA (2025) Database comparison – region. International IDEA. https://www.idea.int/data-tools/data/region-compare?database_theme=293&question_id=9189&typeA=political_entity&regionA=142733&typeB=political_entity&regionB=142733

IFES (2019a) Gender analysis of Ukraine’s electoral and political process. https://ifesukraine.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/IFES-Gender-Assessment-Ukraine-v1-2019-09-30-Eng.pdf

IFES (2019b) 2019 early parliamentary elections in Ukraine: post-election report. https://ifesukraine.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/IFES-Ukraine-2019-Early-Parliamentary-Elections-in-Ukraine-Post-Election-Report-v1-2019-08-20-Eng.pdf

IFES (2023) Grand Duchy of Luxembourg. Election Guide. https://www.electionguide.org/countries/id/126/

IFES Ukraine (2024) Democracy and elections digest. International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES) in Ukraine. https://www.ifesukraine.org/en/analytics/election-bulletins/democracy-and-elections-digest-209-july-20-august-2-2024/

Ivo C, Tuke C (2024) Voters’ perspectives on elections (2011–2021): a hermeneutic study in Chadiza Constituency, Eastern Province, Zambia. Asian Research Journal of Arts & Social Sciences, 22(12): 59–72. https://doi.org/10.9734/arjass/2024/v22i12597

Jackson RP (2021) Disfigurations’ of democracy? Pareto, Mosca and the challenge of ‘elite theor. Topoi, 41(1): 45–55. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11245-021-09773-y

Jacobi D, Freyberg-Inan A (Eds.) (2015) Human Beings in International Relations. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781316337042

Johansson MO (2019) Political participation and development: operationalizing and testing the correlation between inclusive political institutions and economic development. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1303080/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Kaim M (2021) Rethinking modes of political participation. Democratic Theory, 8(1): 50–70. https://doi.org/10.3167/dt.2021.080104

Kostelka F, Linek L, Rovny J, Škvrňák M (2025) Electoral participation and satisfaction with democracy in Central and Eastern Europe. Political Science Research and Methods: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/psrm.2025.10028

Loader BD, Vromen A, Xenos MA (2014) The networked young citizen: social media, political participation and civic engagement. Information, Communication & Society, 17(2): 143–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.871571

Mediendienst Integration (2025) 73 MPs with a migration background. Bundestag 2025. https://mediendienst-integration.de/artikel/73-abgeordnete-mit-migrationshintergrund.html

Nonomura R (2016) Political consumerism and the participation gap: are boycotting and ‘buycotting’ youth-based activities? Journal of Youth Studies, 20(2): 234–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2016.1206861

North DA, Levine D, Sikora K, Diossy N (2024) Building resilience against election influence operations: preparing for the European elections in 2024 and beyond. https://www.ifes.org/publications/building-resilience-against-election-influence-operations

Obregon C (2023) Institutionalism and liberalism. Munich Personal RePEc Archive. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/122455/1/MPRA_paper_122455.pdf

Ojo OG (2022) Public trust and citizen engagement as tools of democracy for good governance in Nigeria. Walden University. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations?utm_source=scholarworks.waldenu.edu%2Fdissertations%2F13669&utm_medium=PDF&utm_campaign=PDFCoverPages

Ologunebi JO, Taiwo OT (2025) The impact of digital communication on governance, political dynamics, and leadership: a case study of the Nigerian people and process. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5094521

Pelser TG, Gaffley G (2020) Implications of digital transformation on the strategy development process for business leaders. In: Promoting Inclusive Growth in the Fourth Industrial Revolution, pp. 1–43. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4882-0.ch001

Prats M, Meunier A (2021) Political efficacy and participation: an empirical analysis in European countries. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, 46. https://doi.org/10.1787/4548cad8-en

Radtke J, Renn O (2024) Participation in energy transitions: a comparison of policy styles. Energy Research & Social Science, 118: 103743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103743

Repucci S, Slipowitz A (2020) Democracy under lockdown: the impact of COVID-19 on the global struggle for freedom. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-10/COVID-19_Special_Report_Final_.pdf

Rothman S (2001) Political elites: recruitment and careers. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 11656–11661. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b0-08-043076-7/01199-2

Ruess C, Hoffmann CP, Boulianne S, Heger K (2021) Online political participation: the evolution of a concept. Information, Communication & Society, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2021.2013919

SCB (2025) General elections, participation survey. Statistics Sweden. https://www.scb.se/en/finding-statistics/search/?query=Valstatistik+&lang=en

Sebestyén A (2025) Political socialization scenarios leading to party membership in an autocratizing democracy: insights from an interview-based study. Political Studies. https://doi.org/10.1177/00323217251351529

Sevignani S (2022) Digital transformations and the ideological formation of the public sphere: hegemonic, populist, or popular communication? Theory, Culture & Society, 39(4): 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/02632764221103516

Shaker R (2025) From policy to platforms: analysing public engagement with Singapore's Smart Nation Initiative through social media discourse. Urban Governance. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ugj.2025.04.001

Silver L, Fagan M, Huang C, Clancy L (2024) Electoral reform and direct democracy. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/?p=27775

Sorice M, Monti G (2022) Political consumerism as a form of political participation. Department of Political Science, Chair of Political Sociology. https://tesi.luiss.it/35020/1/091922_MONTI_GIORGIA.pdf

Tasente T (2020) The 4 phases of evolution of political communication systems: from the golden age of the parties to the golden age of the users. Technium Social Sciences Journal, 2: 76–83. https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v2i1.50

Teorell J (2006) Political participation and three theories of democracy: a research inventory and agenda. European Journal of Political Research, 45(5): 787–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2006.00636.x

Theocharis Y, Deth JW (2017) Political participation in a changing world: conceptual and empirical challenges in the study of citizen engagement. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203728673

Timreck S, Emmons C (2024) People’s political and civic engagement as a counter to democratic backsliding. IFES Learning Agenda Evidence Report. https://www.ifes.org/sites/default/files/2025-01/Youth%20Learning%20Agenda%20Report%202025.pdf

Twist A, Ruijer E, Meijer A (2023) Smart cities & citizen discontent: a systematic review of the literature. Government Information Quarterly, 101799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2022.101799

Uhlaner CJ (2015) Politics and participation. In: International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences, pp. 504–508. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.93086-1

UN Ukraine (2019) The state of youth in Ukraine. Analytical report compiled by the UN Working Group on Youth. https://ukraine.un.org/sites/default/files/2020-06/THE%20STATE%20OF%20YOUTH%20IN%20UKRAINE%20report.pdf

Ünver AN (2020) Civic engagement and political trust of young people in Sweden in relation to their immigration backgrounds. https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1483772/FULLTEXT01.pdf

Vissers S, Stolle D (2013) The internet and new modes of political participation: online versus offline participation. Information, Communication & Society, 17(8): 937–955. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118x.2013.867356

World Bank (2025a) Political stability and absence of violence/terrorism: estimate. Worldwide Governance Indicators. https://databank.worldbank.org/id/f4210a63

World Bank (2025b) Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SG.GEN.PARL.ZS

Yakovlev D, Trushevych H, Diachenko O (2025) Civil engagement vs. party participation: new forms of political interaction of Ukrainians (survey of internally displaced persons). Baltic Journal of Economic Studies, 11(2): 338–345. https://doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2025-11-2-338-345

Ziliotti E (2024) Breaking the mold: normative hybridity as the key to contemporary non-Western political theorizing. American Political Science Review: 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055424000194

Zilla C (2022) Defining democratic inclusion from the perspective of democracy and citizenship theory. Democratization: 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/13510347.2022.2090929

Zittel T, Fuchs D (2007) Participatory democracy and political participation. Routledge. https://www.epdn.org/Uploads/Participatory%20Democracy%20and%20political%20Participation_a4ea.pdf

Téléchargements

Publiée

2026-06-02